Category: Uncategorized

Gladiator: Dignitas, Auctoritas, and All-that-other-tas

Gladiator: Dignitas, Auctoritas, and All-that-other-tas

In the movie Gladiator, we follow the story of Maximus Decimus Meridius and how he works his way back up from being a slave to avenging his family who was killed by Commodus, son of Marcus Aurelius and brother of Maximus.
The movie starts off with Maximus returning to Rome defeating Germanic tribes near Vindobona with the Roman army. He comes back and his father Marcus Aurelius talks to him about making Maximus the successor of the Roman empire since he felt that Commodus wasn’t fit to do so. Upon hearing this, Commodus kills his father as an act of retaliation and seizes the throne for himself. He then asks Maximus for his support and loyalty, but when Maximus refuses, Commodus arranges for Maximus to be arrested and for his family to be killed. After escaping his arrest, he heads back home only to see his wife and child crucified and collapses shortly after.
When he wakes up, he finds that he has been captured by slavers and was then sold to a gladiator trainer named Proximo. Slowly recognizing that there is only 1 way to get out of this and to enact revenge, he reluctantly takes part in local tournaments where he easily wins and starts to earn recognition over time. This leads into the 150 days of games event by Commodus that was started to commemorate his father’s death, where Maximus finds his way into a reenactment of the Battle of Zama as a “Carthaginian”, where he actually leads his army to victory. After this, he reveals to the people in the colosseum and Commodus who he really was and declares an act of vengeance on Commodus. After fighting some more on his way to the top, he eventually faces Commodus in a duel, but was severely injured beforehand to put Commodus at an advantage. Even with that, Commodus dies, only for Maximus to succumb to his injury soon after.
All in all, the main themes I got from watching the movie was the difference between dignitas and auctoritas, with examples being Commodus and Maximus. Throughout the movie, Commodus was given a large amount of auctoritas, which gave him power, but severely lacked in dignitas due to his poor character and his actions throughout the movie. On the other hand, Maximus had a lot of dignitas but lost most of his auctoritas after Commodus arrested him, and this showed in the movie when Maximus had to earn his way up to challenge Commodus to a duel, but along the way gained more dignitas, earning the name Maximus the Merciful after sparing one of the strongest and undefeated gladiators in Tigris of Gaul. The 2 of them were opposites of each other through their actions throughout the movie.

Gladiator (2000) Film and Reflection

Gladiator (2000) Film and Reflection

The movie Gladiator is set during the Roman Empire in 180 AD and begins with General Maximus leading his troops against Germanic tribes, establishing his popularity and skills as a commander.  The emperor Marcus Aurelius confides in Maximus that he will not name his son Commodus as his successor, having Maximus succeed him instead.  Commodus finds out and kills Marcus Aurelius, arresting Maximus who later escapes to find that Commodus has burned and crucified his family.  Taken by slavers, Maximus is sold to a gladiator school in north Africa where he quickly makes a name for himself before being taken to Rome to participate in Commodus’ 150 days of games.  Maximus, fighting with other gladiators in Commodus’ games, gains the admiration of the Roman public.  Commodus feels threatened by this, repeatedly sending Maximus to fight in seemingly unwinnable events.  Maximus is brought into a plot to overthrow Commodus by Lucilla, Commodus’ sister, and the senator Gracchus (no relation).  This fails and Maximus is made to fight Commodus, killing him despite being injured by the emperor beforehand.  Before dying of his wounds, Maximus requests for the freeing of the other slaves who helped him as well as the senators involved in the plot against Commodus and their reinstatement to the Senate.  Here, Maximus is carrying out Marcus Aurelius’ wish to return Rome to a republic.

A central theme in this movie is the Roman concept of dignitas represented by the fight over prestige between Maximus and Commodus.  Initially, Commodus’ status as an emperor, as well as his holding of the games, gives him access to high standing and respect among Romans.  Maximus grows his dignitas by repeatedly winning against the odds and sparing one of his opponents, earning him the title “Maximus the Merciful.”  This angers Commodus who is unable to have him executed in the arena as, because of Maximus’ dignitas and prestige among ordinary Romans, it would reflect poorly on the emperor.  Maximus’ dignitas also makes him a desirable ally for Gracchus, who needs the gladiator’s popularity with the army to march on Rome and overthrow Commodus.  In the end, Commodus’ lowered dignitas also affects his auctoritas, as his subordinate who had helped him seize power refuses to give the emperor another sword in his fight against Maximus, leading to his death.  By the time the movie ends, Maximus’ authority and power to command is greater than Commodus’.

Gaius Antonias Hybria vs. Catiline : the Crows of Death (Jack Sampson ACTA 2)

Gaius Antonias Hybria vs. Catiline : the Crows of Death (Jack Sampson ACTA 2)

Marching towards Rome, then marching north again was weary and tiresome, as our troops, under the great Gaius Antonias Hybria, gave pursuit to Catiline’s forces. Traveling the roads in rank, we encountered many deserters fleeing Catiline’s army upon hearing of the death of Publius Cornelius Lentulus Sura and the other co-conspirators in Rome. By our own estimates, Catiline’s forces had been reduced to around 3,000 strong, no where near the 10,000-man army Catiline commanded a mere three weeks prior. Seeing all these deserters bolstered our troops’ confidence, and allowed us to continue marching through all conditions, eager to destroy the enemy of Rome. They have continually tried to flee towards Gaul, however Quintus Caecilius Metellus Celer had blocked their escape route with his three legions. As we back them into an ever-shrinking corner, I can only assume that the ensuing battle will take place near Pistoia.

On the precipice of battle, our soldiers camped out near Pistoia. On a nearby farm, a quarter-days walk from our camp, I found a pig, a sheep, and a bull. Realizing my luck, I brought the animals back to camp and summoned my unit. We commenced with the Suovetaurilia sacrifice, blessing the ground below us with this Suovetaurilia. Just as we finished with the ceremony, twelve black crows flew overhead, and our unit took great solace in the omen. Feasting on fine meats, I wondered which of my most trusted comrades would survive the battle.

The day of the fabled battle has come. Our soldiers are at ease, having seen good omens the previous day and completing a sacrifice to the gods, ensuring that the battleground would be blessed for them. Peering over the wide field, I can see Catiline and his legions preparing for conflict. With our ranks assuming the testudo formation, we avoided arrow fire as we inched our way towards Catiline’s front line. Viewing our insurmountable force, I noticed Catiline jump on a horse and charge towards the front line with his troops. Just then, another 12 black crows flew above our troops. Seeing this, our troops were spurred to break formation and rush forward onto the field of battle, cutting down the supporters of Catiline. Slashing and cutting through enemy lines, I charged onward with my unit to encounter Catiline head on. Seeing Catiline on my right, I saw him pierce the skull of my friend. I turned and grabbed a spear out of the innards of a fallen soldier and threw it towards him with all my might. Watching the spear pierce his armor, I had no time to celebrate, as I continued to cut through the last of Catiline’s forces. Standing over his lifeless body, looking out at a sea of hacked off limbs, fallen soldiers, and screaming injured, I felt a sigh of relief wash over me. The dignitas of Rome and the Roman people had been saved, and I was glad I could help contribute to victory.

Pictured Above: Roman Tetsudo Formation
Classics Colloquium 4/22: The De-ifferentiation of amicitia

Classics Colloquium 4/22: The De-ifferentiation of amicitia

On Friday, April 22, I (virtually) attended the Agnes Michels lecture, given by Dr. Katharina Volk of Columbia University, titled “Wisdom and Friendship in Cicero’s De amicitia.” I was particularly interested in this talk, as Cicero has been a central figure of our class this year, given his influence on philosophy, intellectualism, and of course, the Crisis of Catiline. Additionally, having read excerpts from De amicitia in a previous Latin class, I was interested to learn more.

Volk began with an establishment of what it meant to be a Roman intellectual to Cicero, and how that differed from “Greek intellectualism.” For Romans, intellectualism was not established by theory and specific teaching, but rather through experience and practicality.

“A Roman senator who engaged in philosophia is still a Roman senator,” she explained.

This key difference in interpreting intellectualism was the focal point for the disparity between the Greeks and Romans. Cicero sought to set his characters apart from the Greek ideas of theoretical knowledge, by equipping them with practical and experiential knowledge.

Laelius, the narrator for much of the story, is mourning the death of his friend Scipio, and is asked to give some commentary on their friendship. He is able to discuss it accurately and objectively not because he has been trained to do so, but because he has experienced friendship well enough to commentate on it. Volk also made note of Laelius’ nickname of Sapiens, meaning wise.

She additionally proposed that Laelius is able to beat the lofty intellectuals of Greece at their own game, as he challenges the wisdom of stoics and Pythagoreans who believe that there is no need for anxiety inducing pain in life. Laelius believes that a balanced individual will have experienced all these different feelings, and thus will have a better understanding of it. The Roman’s experience stands in direct contrast to the Greeks, who create a definition based on principles and theory, rather than life experiences.

I believe this Roman focus on acquiring wisdom and authority, thus working to gain your gravitas and auctoritas, is consistent with what we’ve seen from Roman heroes and exempla. They are exemplary not because they knew about and could explain the virtues, but rather because they could put them into practice in real situations. Volk additionally described Laelius as a “self-insert” character for Cicero, which makes sense, since as a novus homo, Cicero would have had to build himself up as a true champion of Roman wisdom and friendship, since his name wouldn’t have any innate gravitas.

Having read De amicitia before, I was familiar with the connection between friendship and virtue, and that friendship was supposedly reserved for good, wise people. However, I had never considered that Cicero was referring to a “Roman” type of wisdom, meaning wisdom that had been obtained empirically and through practice, as exemplified by Laelius. I am thankful to Dr. Volk for such an insightful talk on a work I was only loosely familiar with beforehand!

Word count: 495

Gladiator (2000): The Focused, Yet Fictional, Hero

Gladiator (2000): The Focused, Yet Fictional, Hero

Gladiator (2000) tells the story of a deposed Roman general and his journey to reclaim glory and honor. At the start of the movie, Maximus Decimus Meridius is a leading general in the Roman army, serving under the emperor Marcus Aurelius. Aurelius, knowing his death is imminent, offers Maximus the chance to succeed him as emperor, over his son Commodus. Hearing this, Commodus suffocates his father to death, claiming the throne himself. After Maximus refuses to swear loyalty to him, Commodus orders the execution of both him and his family. Though Maximus survives, he isn’t able to save his family, and collapses due to exhaustion.

Maximus is abducted in his sleep, and sold into gladiatorial training. A natural warrior, he rises through the ranks quickly, and begins gaining local fame, eventually travelling to Rome to fight in the Colosseum. When he performs unexpectedly well, Commodus honors him, but is surprised to learn of Maximus’ survival and true identity. As Maximus’ popularity grows, his supporters hatch a plan to break him out of slavery, but the plan is exposed and fails, resulting in his capture. He is forced to fight Commodus in a public, fixed fight, where he is fatally injured beforehand. Despite this, he still manages to overpower Commodus, kill him with his own dagger, and avenge his family, before succumbing to his own wounds.

As I watched Gladiator, I couldn’t help but make comparisons between Maximus and Spartacus, the hero of another Rome-themed film. After all, both had risen from slavery to become something more than mere gladiators, and both brought change to Rome, at the cost of their own lives. However, I noticed a key difference between the two; Spartacus shifted between personas, as he changed the mask he was wearing when he was with his wife and his followers, or his enemies. Maximus, meanwhile, was always focused on his duty to attain vengeance for his family, only slightly wavering towards a brief romantic interest in Lucilla, Commodus’ own sister.

Maximus, having been a Roman general, was undoubtedly more familiar with Roman virtues than Spartacus, a former slave, would’ve been. As such, I believe his portrayal as a more accurate, focused, and vengeful Roman hero fits well, when compared to Spartacus’ portrayal as a man of many masks and personas. Of course, this difference may also result from Spartacus being a real person, and Maximus being a totally fictional character, allowing for more creative liberty.

This fictionalization of Maximus allows him to vie for the throne of the Roman Empire, without even being a native Roman, or having any blood relationship to the emperor. This detail stuck out to me, as I do not believe it to be realistic or even possible that Rome would accept a foreign general, not related to the emperor, as its ruler. While the movie was excellent, I did not believe such a situation would ever arise. I can, however, believe in the Roman people supporting Maximus over a despot like Commodus.

Word count: 499

Love Revenge and Eruptions!

Love Revenge and Eruptions!

The movie Pompeii follows the characters Milo, Cassia, Senator Corvus, and Atticus. For the most part, the main setting is Pompeii right before and during the volcanic eruption of 79. In the first scene, we are shown a flashback of Britannia, where Milo’s whole clan is slaughtered by Senator Corvus’s right-hand man Proculus because the clan is Celtic Rebels. Milo ends up surviving and being picked up by slave traders. When Milo is all grown up and has been fighting as a Gladiator in the city of Londinium. His owner, Graecus, watches Milo and decides he should be fighting in Pompeii.

On the journey to Pompeii, we meet Cassia. She is traveling there from Rome. While her carriage is passing the slaves one of her horses hurts itself, this leads to Milo putting it out of its misery. Then we see Cassia running through the city on her way to her family’s villa. At the villa, Cassia is greeted by her parents. We learn they want an imperial investment when they speak with Senator Corvus in the army camp. 

The scene then shifts to the Arena. Here we meet Atticus, who is the current champion of Graecus’s gladiators and is one win away from freedom. We see the gladiators training for the Games which are set to be the next day. In the games, Atticus is set to fight Milo in the final fight of the day. During training, they fight but the Thracian’s brother tries to stab Milo. Atticus saves him, beginning their friendship. At night they are brought to Cassia’s Villa to be shown off. During the party, we learn the reason Cassia left Rome was because of interactions with the Senator. 

It is time for the games and the order of fights has been changed. Milo and Atticus are part of the first fight which is a recreation of the slaughter of Milo’s people. Milo and Atticus win and upset the Senator’s plans. Vesuvius then erupts and chaos ensues. During the eruption, Milo and Atticus fight Corvus and Proculus and beat them. Milo and Cassia can finally be together but they do not escape the eruption and die in the ash. Upon watching this movie I had a few questions. I was wondering if Cassia’s father was the proconsul who was in charge of Pompeii. I was also confused about the emperor’s situation in Rome, more specifically why was calling Emperor Titus “new” a bad thing? Or did I miss something from the scene that was more an issue? Also, in regards to the announcers for the bouts in the arena, did they actually wear those masks? Even with these questions though, I thought the movie was very entertaining and a fun experience. Also, while I was not a fan of some of the inaccuracies of the eruption I did think they made for better drama. I always find it interesting that many of the Roman-based films I have watched have the antagonist being a corrupt politician, in this movie Senator Corvus in Gladiator it is Commodus.

Cacio e Pepe: A (not so classic?) Roman Classic

Cacio e Pepe: A (not so classic?) Roman Classic

Kai-Ling, Kate and I made cacio e pepe, a pasta dish with cheese and black pepper sauce, as a final Roman dinner. Having made cacio e pepe before, I had heard it often described as a quintessentially Roman dish, and I learned from a friend outside this class who had visited Italy that cacio e pepe is still very common in modern-day Rome. Though my frienf wasn’t able to try to the dish directly, he still loves cacio e pepe from his days in Rome, making it at home and searching it out on menus, and recalls it as one of the dishes that made him love pasta. Yet with only three ingredients (spaghetti, pecorino romano cheese, and black pepper), none of them ingredients only available in Europe after contact with the Americas, and all of them seemingly in line with other ancient Roman dishes I had heard of that seemed to mainly involve cheese and wheat products, I figured it might be possible that cacio e pepe (or something close to it) might have been made in Ancient Rome as well . I did further research into the dish’s origins, finding an informative BBC article by Emily Monaco (https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20200512-cacio-e-pepe-italys-beloved-3-ingredient-pasta-dish) that described several possible origin stories for cacio e pepe, including legends that it was first made by shepherds in the Appenine mountains who made the dish on cold nights since dried pasta, sheep’s milk cheese, and dried pepper could all be easily acquired, transported, and kept for long periods of time and made into a simple yet flavorful and filling dish. Yet others argue that the dish most likely originated in the 1800’s as “is said to have arrived in Italy through the Venetian ports” and thus wouldn’t have been available to most Romans before the unification of Italy and widespread trade between cities across the peninsula.

Whatever its origins, I enjoyed making this dish- I used the Bon Appetit recipe here but was a bit disappointed by the results, as I’ve made cacio e pepe using other recipes that I thought had turned out more flavorful. The Bon Appetit recipe I used called for using butter in the sauce, which, according to the BBC article, would not be typical for most Roman recipes of the dish that rely solely on reserved starchy pasta water, fat from the shredded cheese, and careful mixing technique to produce a creamy sauce, and the use of cream or butter would be immediately sniffed out and condemned by most native Romans. The next time I make cacio e pepe, I’ll probably use a different recipe, bloom more pepper in the pan without butter and let it cook for longer to intensify the flavor, and add the starchy water more gradually before adding the pasta.

Bon Appetit Recipe: (https://www.bonappetit.com/recipe/cacio-e-pepe)

Ingredients

2 servingsKosher salt

6oz. pasta (such as egg tagliolini, bucatini, or spaghetti)

3Tbsp. unsalted butter, cubed, divided

1tsp. freshly cracked black pepper

¾cup finely grated Grana Padano or Parmesan

⅓cup finely grated Pecorino

Preparation

Step 1

Bring 3 quarts water to a boil in a 5-qt. pot. Season with salt; add pasta and cook, stirring occasionally, until about 2 minutes before tender. Drain, reserving ¾ cup pasta cooking water.

Step 2

Meanwhile, melt 2 Tbsp. butter in a Dutch oven or other large pot or skillet over medium heat. Add pepper and cook, swirling pan, until toasted, about 1 minute.

Step 3

Add ½ cup reserved pasta water to skillet and bring to a simmer. Add pasta and remaining butter. Reduce heat to low and add Grana Padano, stirring and tossing with tongs until melted. Remove pan from heat; add Pecorino, stirring and tossing until cheese melts, sauce coats the pasta, and pasta is al dente. (Add more pasta water if sauce seems dry.) Transfer pasta to warm bowls and serve.

BBC Recipe: (https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20200512-cacio-e-pepe-italys-beloved-3-ingredient-pasta-dish)

Simone Zanoni’s Spaghetti Cacio e Pepe

Ingredients:
200g high-quality, artisanal spaghetti (Zanoni uses Neapolitan spaghetti)
4-7g wild black peppercorns (adjust to taste, depending on the assertiveness of the pepper)
160g Pecorino Romano, plus two pieces Pecorino rind
3l water seasoned with 15g of kosher salt

Instructions:
Prepare your mise en place (the French world for having all your ingredients prepped and measured) in advance. Crush the peppercorns with a mortar and pestle. (If you do not have a mortar and pestle, use the bottom of a saucepan to crush them on a chopping board.) Grate the Pecorino with a Microplane (grater).

Bring the water to a boil, season with the salt, and add the spaghetti. Stir gently at the beginning to keep the pasta from sticking to the bottom of the pot.

Meanwhile, toast ¾ of the pepper in a pan over low heat until aromatic, about 1 minute. Be careful not to burn the pepper. Remove the pan from the heat, and gently add 2 to 3 ladlefuls of starchy pasta water to the pepper. Bring to a boil. Add the cheese crusts and simmer.

When the spaghetti is half-cooked (after about six minutes), transfer it to the pan with the peppercorns and starchy pasta water, reserving the remaining cooking water. Transfer another ladleful of water to the pan. After a few more minutes, remove the Pecorino rinds, and place them in a non-stick pan over medium heat to toast on both sides. When nicely toasted, remove and set aside.

Meanwhile, continue cooking the spaghetti until two minutes before al dente (cooked “to the tooth” with a slight bite). Turn off the heat and allow the pasta to rest; there should be a bit of cooking water left in the pan.

After about a minute off the heat, begin adding the grated cheese to the pasta from above, shaking the pan all the while to coat evenly. Add cooking water as needed to help the sauce bind; the sauce will thicken as the pasta sets.

Serve the pasta in a warmed dish. Top with the remaining pepper and a little bit of freshly grated Pecorino. Finely slice the toasted Pecorino rinds and sprinkle on top.

Rome on the Screen

Rome on the Screen

By Zoe Carlson

 I watched HBO’s Rome. Episodes one through three. The first episode gives the viewers context of the existing beef between Gaius Julius Ceaser and Pompey. Pompey is shown complaining to Cato about Ceaser, saying things along the lines of that he has the love and support of the plebians. The episode also depicts Caesar defeating the Guals. It was interesting to me how the friendship between Pompey and Ceaser was incredibly superficial. Another interesting thing about this episode was when Brutus visited caesar he was incredibly nice to him saying that he  has his full support, but when he went back to Rome, he made up that Ceaser is demoralized and that the plebs that support him are thinking of mutiny. I did not enjoy watching the ox being crucified and all of its blood pouring down on Ceasers nephew as a sacrifice to the gods.  Also in the first episode, Guais Octavian was captured and later saved by Pullo and the redheaded soldier whose name escapes me at the moment. In episode two, Ceaser officially declares that he will make Pompey his enemy. Because Pompey went to the senate to attempt to end Ceaser’s term due to the fact that Caesar took Pompey’s most prized possession away: the love of the people. I did not enjoy the scene in which Pullo was in surgery, the close-up shots of his bare scalp did not please my stomach. Also, it was surprising to me that he healed so quickly and was ready to fight the next day. In episode three the war was officially waged. According to this show, it was because Pullo started a fight in a bar and later saw that man while marching to the senate, and the man attacked him, even though Pompey specifically ordered that no blood should be shed in order to prevent a war. Overall I thought the show was very interesting and funny.  I loved seeing what I learned in class come to life.

Living as a Stoic

Living as a Stoic

I really enjoyed being stoic! I practiced stoicism from the 25th to yesterday and I feel like I learned a lot. Meditation is something that I got into a lot during quarantine 2020, but kind of lost my time for it as the days started getting busy again. The reflections at the beginning and end of the day really benefited my work ethic and overall mood. I found myself reflecting on things like my internal reactions to situations, not just my external reactions. I also really enjoyed the quotes for each day. My favorite one was “We were born for cooperation, like feet, like hands, like eyelids, like the rows of upper and lower teeth. So to work in opposition to one another is against nature: and anger or rejection is opposition.” I believe this quote resonated with me because of the nature of the Haverford community. There are times when, as a student body, we are working together, and others when we are working against one another. But the times when we are cooperating are those when I remember why I love it here so much. When there are rifts in the campus’ social life, you can feel the literal energy shift on campus, as if nature itself is rejecting our conflict. On my final day living as a stoic, I was feeling relaxed and ready to get the most out of my seventh day as a stoic. I also love nature so this worked out! The midday exercise made me feel wonderfully small. There is something comforting about being a small part of something large. And that everyone around me is also a small piece with me, and we are in turn working together for some unknown reason. This view from above was a great way of conceptualizing this idea. I absolutely adored the evening text as well. The concept of my ancestors having touched the same earth as me made me feel so connected to my surroundings and nature. This gave me an amazing sense of belonging and comfortability with where I am. The midday exercise for Sunday also resonated with me heavily, discussing the idea of what is in our power. Recognizing the things that are outside of my control helped with my self-analysis and viewing myself outside of myself. As I was evaluating the things causing negative emotions in my life I asked if it was something I could control or not. If it was something I could control, I would write down what I could do to change those negative emotions, and if it was something I could not control, I made a conscious effort to not dwell on those negative emotions. This helped me to pinpoint the source of negative things in my life and either take action to change those negative things or accept their presence. Overall, I really enjoyed living the week like a stoic. I knew what I wanted to accomplish, and how I could accomplish it, regardless of adversity, and at the end of the day, I was able to reflect and think about how to improve for the next day. I can definitely say I will be making a conscious effort to implement some of these practices into my daily routine and some of these ideas into my own mindset, as I think they will really help me learn from my daily life and conquer and move past adversity. 

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum

Richard Lester’s A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum, depicts the a slave named Pseudolus and his attempts to become a free man. Pseudolus has been trying to buy his freedom for quite awhile, until he sees the perfect opportunity to get his freedom by helping his master Hero, obtain the girl of his dreams. Hero promises Pseudolus his freedom if he can help Hero marry a woman named Philia, who lives next door in the house of Lycus, which is a house of courtesans. Pseudolus is able to improvise a plan to help young Hero, as his parents are out of town and cannot control the actions of either Hero or Pseudolus for the time being. The pair discover a roadblock in their plan, when Lycus informs the pair that Philia has just been sold to a heroic Roman captain who is coming to retrieve his new wife in a matter of hours. The pair decide to lie to Lycus and declare that a plague took over her country of Crete and that she the plague. They say they can look after her until the captain arrives and Lycus agrees. At first, Philia is reluctant to marry Hero and wants to honor her contract, but then the two fall in love, and Pseudolus and Hero hatch a plan to flee with Philia and to marry in secret. When soldiers of the captain visit Lycus, they declare the bride must be ready in an hour and if she is not, then his house will be ransacked and the rest of his women will be taken. Pseudolus decides to trade places with Lycus, to try and better his and Hero’s chances of fleeing with Philia. Once the captain of arrives, Pseudolus does his best to stall until Hero can return with mare sweat to create a sleeping potion for Philia. Eventually, Pseudolus uses another slave, Hysteria, as a decoy of a dead Philia to try and trick the captain that his bride has died. The captain is at first fooled, but Hysteria “rises from the dead” after the captain declares he will cut the bride’s heart out in honor of her. Pseudolus, Hero, Philia, Hysterium, Lycus, and another women Gymnasia all try to flee Rome and lead the captain and his soldiers on a chase through the countryside.

Eventually they are all caught and brought back to Rome, but it is revealed that both the captain and Philia are the long-lost children of Hero’s next door neighbor, Erronius. Erronius had been a long journey to find where his children went, but once he returns home, he is able to see that the captain and Philia are his children. In the end, everyone is happy, as Hero gets his bride, Pseudolus is now a free man, and even the captain gets 2 new brides. The movie is played out as a comedy and musical and was very enjoyable to watch.

css.php