Category: Uncategorized

sleep deprived hot takes on Monty Python: The Life of Brian

sleep deprived hot takes on Monty Python: The Life of Brian

“You gotta come up with something better, love. Come on, exercise what few remaining brain cells you have.” My friend said with much exasperation when I told her the plan for my last ACTA. Well, my last few brain cells have already handed in their two weeks resignation three weeks ago, and I am a woman set in my ways. It’s not that I don’t know that Life of Brian doesn’t belong in a Roman history course just as Olive Garden doesn’t belong in an editorial on Italian cuisine. That doesn’t stop me from arguing for it, though. 

The final session of Roman Rev hammered into all of us the importance of legacy. And just as we often interpret history to be unchanging words printed on dry paper, legacy seemed such a static thing. What has caused it to happen has already happened, and here we stand, in a shadow as permanent as the death it commemorates. It is passive, and can only fade rather than rise. Yet the colosseum has lights fitted into it now, to help improve its attractiveness for night time tourism. My relative installed a god awful cherubic statue on her porch, which was promptly dubbed “pasty boy” by her son. My point here is that legacy is very much an active part of history as people take part in manipulating and shifting what has been left to them, highlighting this part and ignoring that part to make the past fit their narrative. We take shadows from ancient tales and wove plays out of them, and those plays then become the true history to many people. Legacy and historical narratives are always shifting, and reflect more on the current world as much as it did the past.

Life of Brian is a story which keenly focused on this sense of a shifting legacy. Set in the time of Jesus, it is very much a religious satire as it poked holes or offered alternative explanations for the fantastical stories recorded. But even more so, it is a satirization of the narrative which we have assigned to the past. The Romans portrayed were pompous and kafka-like in their obsession with bureaucracy, armed with upper-class British accents and a resounding deafness to humor or timing. Monty Python Troupe had taken the ideologies that we masked the Romans’ with, and turned them into caricatures.

From Ben-Hur to Spartacus, an interesting dichotomy of our obsession with Rome is that Rome is often played as the bad guy in our stories. Rome to the modern soul meant power, and while we idolize power, we also idolize a controlled sense of individualism. Spartacus or Ben-Hur, while rebelling against Rome firmly represented the widely popular ideas of vengeance, justice or freedom, and later a new form of populist power itself. The story then quickly turns into taking down the establishment. Life of Brian understood this take, and turned it around its head. Rome is still the establishment, but it is in effect a relatively powerless one, swamped by bureaucracy and general idiocy. The supposedly heroic populist movement however, is even more meaningless, and in the end succumbing to its own mania and in fighting. Nothing is serious in Brian, nothing makes sense, because what it isn’t grounded in reality. It’s almost like taking the lights of the Colosseum and making a light show out of it complete with inflatable statues, and through that spectacle the organizers show the audience how far our perception is from what once truly was.

Cleopatra (1963)

Cleopatra (1963)

The film Cleopatra is an interesting story that follows a large sum of Cleopatra’s life up to the point of her untimely demise. The first part of the film covers Cleopatra and Julius Caesar’s relationship. With the help of Caesar, Cleopatra is named queen of Egypt. Cleopatra starts to plan for a future with Caesar. She fantasizes about the two of them ruling the world together. Cleopatra and Caesar ultimately marry, and Cleopatra gives birth to their son. After returning to Rome, Caesar becomes the dictator. He extends an invite for Cleopatra to join him in Rome. Shortly after this Caesar is assassinated. When his will is read, however, it recognizes Caesar’s adopted son to be his heir rather than his and Cleopatra’s son. Cleopatra leaves Rome to return to Egypt.

Eventually Antony and Cleopatra begin an affair. This affair is ruptured when Antony must marry Octavia to prevent political unrest. Cleopatra is furious and eventually Antony divorces Octavia and marries Cleopatra. This sparks controversy and through a series of events Rome declares war on Egypt. At the end of this war Antony is tricked into believing that Cleopatra has killed herself, which he responds to by ending his own life. Cleopatra’s son is killed during the war. Eventually, Cleopatra is then offered by Octavian that she might rule Egypt but now as a province of Rome. The film ends with Cleopatra, with the the help of her assistants, taking her own life.

Despite some obvious dramatization, this film did a great job of showing some of the absurdities of Roman politics. I had no idea how deep Cleopatra’s involvement in some of these later Roman political moments was. I also had no clue what the actual relationship dynamic between Caesar and Cleopatra was before this. I feel as though it can sometimes be undersold as a brief affair in which Caesar spent a bit of time in Rome, but it was ultimately a fling. This film showed that that was very much not the case. Because our class mostly covered the time period up to this point, I also didn’t know much about Mark Antony. It was very interesting to learn about his involvement/relationship to all of these moments in history. I had also somehow missed in history that Cleopatra took her own life. I feel like this movie filled a lot of gaps in my historical knowledge about this era, while also being very entertaining.

A Fraternal Lamentation

A Fraternal Lamentation

Oh Hybrida, my former brother

I would have done anything for you

If you killed your father, I would have jumped into the sack for you

Into the cold river, I would have let the dog tear out my achilles

The serpent my eyes, the monkey my face

If it were a crime unspeakable, I would have taken the fish and radish in your stead

If the tyrannical vulture came for you, I would have let it eat out my heart before it touched you

Us, we were partners, friends, brothers

But, as if Cicero had is own special Fascinum

He took hold of you, corrupted you, stole you from me

With his dark magic, he convinced you to betray me

Taken from me, who served with you as consul

Betray ME, who gave you his own law from his back

What god have I wronged, what ritual neglected, which rite ignored?

Like Lucretia, I lament for the loss of purity, our purity

I never thought you would let Cicero be our Sextus

Why must I anguish so? The stoics,

They say to revel in every challenge, to thank god for every obstacle,

To not be consumed by the actions of others, for they are ignorant of right and wrong

But, you, you know right from wrong

You are not a stranger, you were my brother

But now, you are gone, I cannot recognize your face

Our eyes, you refuse to let them meet 

The words leaving your mouth sound foreign and strange (except when you stole my law that was pretty familiar).

Your hands move in ways I’ve never seen before

You have left me, and with you, have taken my heart and soul

A thief is what you are

An Ode to Elephants

An Ode to Elephants

First introduced by Alexander the Great

For their size and power, elephants were used in war 

Some armies surrendered or accepted their fate

Because war elephants could kill 10,000 or more 

However, this military technology was not embraced by all

The Romans refused to use elephants in any way

A free republic would never play in a monarch’s game

Unfortunately, the men in the Roman army did fall

Their men were trampled as they ran away

But out of the darkness and bloodshed, honor became the republic’s name

Amicitia on TV!

Amicitia on TV!

This past week, I have watched the first couple of episodes of Season 1 of HBO’s Rome. The show begins with an insight into the relationship between Gnaeus Pompey Magnus and Gaius Julius Caesar. In the first episode, we are also introduced to Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo. We see Pullo disobey Vorenus and get publicly shamed, something that I believe we learned about in class as punishment. Caesar is depicted as winning the long war against the Gauls as his daughter, and Pompey’s wife dies during childbirth. Cato the Younger then pushes to strip Caesar of his powers, yet it is Pompey who comes to defend him, even though secretly, he too is worried by Caesar’s powers. We then see Vorenus dragging Pullo along on a mission to retrieve the Aquila, as he thinks it is bound to fail. Later in the first episode, I see another reminder of something from class, which is the idea of omens. After Octavian is rescued by Vorenus and Pullo, he says that the theft of the Aquila is actually a blessing for Caesar.

One thing I found interesting in the first couple of episodes is the idea of friendship, or amicitia. Friendship in the show, between Pompey and Caesar, and even Vorenus and Pullo to an extent, is shown to be complex and has many motivating factors, like that which we learned in class. Pompey talks about Caesar as his friend and defends him against Cato, yet it is a façade. He cannot actually jump the gun and reveal his true feelings fearing how this might end up affecting him. With Vorenus and Pullo, we see Pullo disrespect Vorenus and Vorenus consequently punishing Pullo, yet Vorenus frees him and brings him along for the rescue mission, showing that there is a sort of contract within the friendship. It was interesting how Caesar and Pompey were putting on an appearance of friendship, while both were secretly plotting to attack the other. Whoever breaks the friendship, however, might end up having less political sway because they are viewed as attacking first. This theme of appearance versus reality fits in line with exactly what we had learned in class and shows the intensely political nature of many of these relationships.

Ancient Roman Dessert Omelete

Ancient Roman Dessert Omelete

For my second acta, I decided to do another actum delectamentum. This time, I sought to recreate the dessert dish “ova Spongia ex Lacte. This ancient Roman dessert is thought to be similar to a sweet omelet a pancake with milk. Once again, I noticed the lack of ingredients in the recipe. Maybe this makes sense since if it was during the Roman Republic, then they had not gone too far to find other ingredients like they would have during their imperial period. I did not really understand how this was supposed to be a pancake since there were only wet ingredients. A sweet omelet with milk felt more appropriate. Because of the simplicity of the dish, I luckily had all of the ingredients in my apartment already. I scaled the recipe down and mixed the eggs, milk, and oil together. I used olive oil because I thought that it would add more flavor than a neutral oil like canola oil. Because of the oil, it was fairly difficult to emulsify since I would whisk it and achieve that but I was also cooking a Bolognese at the same time so I only paid the actum so much attention. I poured the mixture into a heated pan and let it cook until the bottom and some of the top set and then I attempted to flip it. However, because of my lack of skill and the omlete to pan ratio, I broke it a bit. I let that cook for a bit longer and then served it on a plate and topped it with honey and black pepper.

I was honestly happy with the dessert. I thought it tasted better than the libum I had previously made. I guess that isn’t too surprising considering that it was basically an omelet with some honey. The honey was a great touch as it served to complexify the flavor a bit more. Once again, the dish was in dire need of salt. That would have definitely brought the sweetness and egg/milk mixture out more. I feel that this would have been a great combination of sweet and savory for a dessert course after having a Roman dinner with some savory garum!

The Roman Colosseum

The Roman Colosseum

This is my version of the Roman Colosseum. It was constructed over 1900 years ago, and much of it still remains standing today. Due to its enormity, it stands as one of the 7 wonders of the world and the largest amphitheater in the world to this day. The colosseum housed gladiatorial/hunting games for over 390 years, and in that time, saw the death of around 1 million animals, and hundreds of thousands of people. The sand that covered the floor of the colosseum was tinted red due to the severe amounts of blood shed during the gladiatorial games. What was once a site of death and violence, now is one of the greatest tourist attractions around the world giving us an important look into roman daily life and history.

Actum Cinemagraphicum: Pompeii: Boahen Kwakye

Actum Cinemagraphicum: Pompeii: Boahen Kwakye

05/05/22


My Acta Reflection is based on a movie called Pompeii. It seems like more of a drama than a historical account of what happened on the island of Pompeii. The inspiration of the movie comes from the eruption of Mount of Vesuvius that completely covered the island with lava and ash. This happened around 79 A.D. and allowed archaeologists to learn a great deal about the Roman people, customs and culture since the lava and ash preserved the city very well. In the movie, there are a lot of circumstances that were plausible for a city during Ancient Rome intertwined with the plot.

The story begins with the conquest of a tribe of Celtics by a Roman army and the protagonist’s younger self was captured by slave traders. Ancient Rome held a large amount of land surrounding the Mediterranean Sea, including parts of present-day North Africa, the Middle East and a vast majority of Southern Europe. The Romans often took prisioners of war to serve as slaves for the aristocracy or anyone wealthy enough to afford them. Similarly, the protagonist Milo was reared as a gladiator for the Gladiator games held at the Colosseum. He attracts the attention of a royal princess named Cassia who is the daughter of a governor, a relationship that would never gain a blessing from anyone at the time. This particularly angers Roman Senator Corvus who was responsible for the death of MIlo’s parents during the Celtic horseman invasion. Corvus is unaware of this connection but is more concerned with Milo gaining the affection of the woman that he is interested in.

After a lot of fighting and gladiator style epic shots, Milo and his love are unable to escape the incoming lava flow and fireball and within the embrace of one another. They are shown in each other’s eternal embrace in the modern day as archaeologists excavate the city. I know that is love story is probably not how the couple lived their lives but it was a wonderful Roman Tale that I would recommend to anyone young and old.

css.php