Category: Uncategorized

Gladiator: The Road to Revenge

Gladiator: The Road to Revenge

During spring break, I watched the movie Gladiator with my family. Released in 2000 and directed by Ridley Scott, this historical epic received critical acclaim. Taking place in 180 AD, the movie begins with a scene of the main character, Maximus, leading the Romans to victory against the armies of Germania. After this success, the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius declares that he wants Maximus to succeed the throne, not his son Commodus. Marcus Aurelius does not believe that his son is moral and capable of ending political corruption and restoring Rome to its former glory, emphasizing the Roman values of virtue and honor. Riddled with feelings of anger and betrayal upon learning of his father’s plans, Commodus suffocates and kills Marcus Aurelius. Maximus manages to escape execution at the order of Commodus, but soon finds his home destroyed and his wife and son brutally killed. 

Maximus is then captured and sold into slavery to a man named Proximo. To conceal his identity and former glory, Maximus removes his SPQR tattoo and goes by the alias of the Spaniard. Proximo trains Maximus to fight as a gladiator and when offered the opportunity to fight in Rome, Maximus is eager to find Commodus and enact revenge for the slaughter of his family. In his first fight in the Colosseum, Maximus encourages the gladiators to work together and they are victorious. However, after the battle, Maximus shocks Commodus and his sister Lucilla by revealing his true identity, as they thought he was long dead. Seeking to kill Maximus, Commodus has him fight the notorious Tigris of Gaul. In an act of defiance, Maximus refuses to kill his competitor, further angering Commodus. Simultaneously, fearing for their lives and the future of Rome, the Roman senator, Gracchus, Commodus’s sister, Lucilla, and Maximus plot to overthrow Commodus and end his dictatorial reign. Nonetheless, their rebellion goes awry when Commodus learns about the scheme through Lucilla’s son, Lucius. In the chaos that ensues, Maximus is captured by Commodus and Gracchus is imprisoned. Commodus then declares that he will fight Maximus in the Colosseum, but first stabs and weakens him. Despite being injured, Maximus defeats and kills Commodus in the arena. Maximus soon dies, but not before declaring the reinstatement of Senator Gracchus and Marcus Aurelius’s wish to restore the Roman Republic. Although the ending is unfortunate, it is not completely clouded in sadness, as Maximus is finally able to get revenge and reunite with his wife and son.

I enjoyed watching this movie and found the fight scenes especially interesting. The intense and graphic nature of the battle scenes reminded me of fights in the Lord of the Rings, specifically the Battle of Helm’s Deep and the Battle of Gondor. I also thought that the soundtrack was fantastic because it really captured the emotion and loss of characters, especially during the scene when Maximus returns home to find that his wife and son have been killed. Overall, I would definitely recommend this movie to a friend!

Barbarī!

Barbarī!

Barbarians is a show that showcases the interactions between the Romans and the people of Germania. There are two main points that make this show unique. First is the general plot and theme of the show. It follows the character Arminius, who was the son of a German Chief, but given away as tribute to the Romans. While in Rome, he was adopted by a patrician, and he was brought up as a Roman. After gaining notoriety in the Roman army, Arminius is sent back to Germania to help his adoptive father, Publius Qunictilius Varus, keep Germania in check. Once Arminius begins interacting with people he used to know, he becomes conflicted, feeling affection for both the Romans and the Germans. Eventually, Arminius decides to betray the Romans and leads the three legions in Germania to their deaths. From this story, it was interesting to see the internal conflict within Arminius that lead to this decision. 

Inside of him was the conflict between the longing to return home, and his sense of duty as a Roman Equestrian. Part of the reason that Arminius decides to betray the Romans is the rejection he feels from the Romans. Because of his “barbarian” origins, he is unable to climb higher than equestrian on the cursus honorum. As a result he is tasked to stay in Germania and rule his Germanic father’s tribe, unable to return to Rome. Not only was this information given to him by the empire, but also his father. I wonder if Rome was more willing to advance Arminius’s political career, would he have decided to remain loyal to Rome. This indirectly shows how the Romans thought about foreigners, even if they grew up in Rome. Another way the show presented cultural differences was in the way wolves were thought of by the Germans and the Romans. Instilled from a young age, the Germans taught Arminius to fear the wolf, but contrary to this, the Romans taught him to love the wolf.

Given these conflicting messages, Arminius was always questioning which view he believed. Presenting wolves as both a destroyer and a savior, the writers intended these ideas to be symbolic of the power Arminius had within him – the power to destroy or save the Romans. Ever since his young age, he held this conflict within himself, but he favored the Romans as he kept acquiring accolades. However, once his dreams were destroyed, he was quick to seek vengeance by siding with the Germans. The second reason that this was enthralling was because of the languages spoken. In this show, old German and Latin were spoken by their respective peoples. By doing this, even if the grammar and pronunciation is not correct, it creates an immersive and engaging experience. It also helps to showcase the communication difficulties that exist, which would have been ignored if it was in English. The show was highly engaging and I would recommend it to anyone who finds Rome interesting.

Roman Dessert Pancakes – An Ancient Delicacy

Roman Dessert Pancakes – An Ancient Delicacy

Over spring break, I took on the challenge of creating an authentic Roman dish with the help of fellow classmates Tiffany, Abby, and Annie. The British Museum wrote a blog post with nine ancient Roman and Greek recipes and the one that caught our eye was the dessert pancakes with honey and sesame seeds. The recipe calls for fairly simple ingredients and can be found here: https://blog.britishmuseum.org/cook-a-classical-feast-nine-recipes-from-ancient-greece-and-rome/ 

Ingredients

• 120g flour

• 225 ml water

• 2 tbsp clear honey

• Oil for frying

• 1 tbsp toasted sesame seeds

Process:

We heated oil in a small pan for frying and while it heated up we mixed the flour, water, and honey together in a bowl until there weren’t any clumps left. Once the oil was hot we dropped a large spoonful of batter into the oil and let it fry until golden brown on one side. We then flipped it until the other side was also a delicious golden brown color. Next, we placed the pancakes on paper towels to drain off any excess oil before drizzling them with honey and sesame seeds. We decided to take our own twist on the pancakes and also add some everything but the bagel seasoning to the pancakes to add a little seeds and flavor. 

Review:

The honey and toppings on the pancakes were a big hit and all 4 of our pancakes were eaten. The biggest downside was that the middle of the pancake was rather dense and chewy despite the outside layer of the pancake being crisp and golden brown. I think this is due to a lack of leavening agent or perhaps because the oil wasn’t quite hot enough. I wouldn’t make these Roman pancakes again but if they were placed in front of me I would eat them again.

The ingredients called for in this recipe are fairly simple and wholesome so it makes sense that they were staples in Roman desserts. I didn’t realize that sesame seeds were such an ancient staple but it was cool to learn about all the different things Romans used sesame seeds for. I can see how these pancakes were an easy yet yummy dessert to make. I can also easily picture Roman children with sticky honey covered fingers sitting around munching on the pancakes.  

The Pancake Frying Away
The lovely browned/crisp outside and the dense/chewy inside
Celebrating the final product before taking out first bites!
Roman Pancakes

Roman Pancakes

For my second ACTA, I decided to cook my own Roman-inspired dessert. The dessert that I chose to make were pancakes with honey and sesame seeds. I found this recipe off a Roman meal website that included quotes of famous Romans that participated in cooking. Approximately 1,800 years ago, Galen, a Greek physician and philosopher in the Roman Empire, talked about how to make these Roman pancakes, called teganitais. He claimed, “the oil is put in a frying-pan resting on a smokeless fire, and when it has heated, the wheat flour, mixed with plenty of water, is poured on” (britishmuseum.org). Unlike Galen, 1,800 years ago, I was able to use a stovetop with electric heat to fry these pancakes. Despite these few technological differences, it was interesting to see the similarities between the recipe processes from such different time periods.  

Overall, the process of making this dessert was fairly easy. The recipe only required five simple ingredients: flour, honey, oil, water and sesame seeds. All I had to do was measure out my ingredients and then place them into a mixing bowl. In order to properly measure my substances, I had to convert the ingredients from the metric system into the imperial system. After mixing the ingredients, I placed small scoops of batter into a hot pot of oil. I fried the mini pancakes for about a minute and 30 seconds on each side. I used a mixture of canola and olive oil. After doing that, I placed the pancake on a paper towel. I let it cool for a few minutes and then eventually drizzled honey on top and then the sesame seeds. They looked relatively appetizing. Additionally, because I have celiac disease, I substituted wheat flour for gluten-free rice flour. It seemed to still work out, however, the pancakes did not rise as much when they were being fried.  

The simplicity and lack of sweetness in this “dessert” made me reflect more on what Roman foods were like back then. Ancient Romans primarily ate foods that were seasonally or locally accessible. Their diets primarily consisted of cereals, legumes, some meat, cheese, and vegetables. They did not have access to the complex sweeteners and sugars that our society uses today to make desserts so candied and sugary. In general, I liked the taste of my creation. It was simple, a nice texture, and had a thick inside. However, one thing I would change in the future is to add more toppings. To add more flavor and spice in the future, I might have added chocolate chips, cinnamon, ground cloves, or some sort of fruit. Additionally, honey is not my favorite, so I might have switched that ingredient to maple syrup. I think making this dessert slightly sweeter would have made the dish taste a little better overall. 

   *Additionally, I had one of my friends Natalie try one of my Roman pancakes. At first, she had claimed it was a little bland, but she then took another bite and liked it much better. She said that the honey and sesame seeds added a nice touch and pulled all of the flavors together. She said that without those ingredients she might have not considered this recipe a dessert because of how dull it tasted. We cooked this meal in the VCAM and it was a very engaging and different experience!  

Link to recipe:

https://blog.britishmuseum.org/cook-a-classical-feast-nine-recipes-from-ancient-greece-and-rome/

Ingredients: 

-120 grams of flour 

-225 mL of water 

-2 tbsp clear honey 

-Oil for frying 

-1 tbsp toasted sesame seeds  

Images of the cooking process:

Thank you so much for reading!  

-Tiffany Mikulis

A Rockin Roman Cheesecake!

A Rockin Roman Cheesecake!

Over spring break I chose to make a dish called Libum or an ancient Roman cheesecake. In ancient Rome, this sacrificial cake was offered to household spirits, but was also enjoyed by Romans as well. Although I do not typically bake, I wanted to challenge myself in the kitchen. My sister, Emma, also volunteered to help me make my dough and cook these cheesecake buns. I was able to find all of the ingredients except for the bay leaves so rather than cook the buns on a fresh bay leaf, I put them directly on the greased baking tray. The recipe also called for one cup of flour. However, while forming the buns I had to add extra flour, since the dough was very sticky, which made it difficult to separate and mold. Despite this change, the rest of the recipe and cooking process was straightforward and easy to follow. 

Although the recipe said to bake the buns for 35-40 minutes, I took them out of the oven after only 30 minutes, since they were already a nice golden brown color. If I let the buns bake for longer I was afraid that they would burn. When the cheesecake buns came out of the oven, I was surprised by how round they were. I was expecting the buns to be flatter. In the future, before I put the dough in the oven I would flatten the buns into more of a thick pancake. Once the buns soaked and cooled in honey for thirty minutes, I had my entire family try this Roman delicacy. The buns were not very “cake-like” but had a consistency that more resembled bread. The inside of the buns were moist and you could easily taste the ricotta cheese. The honey added a sweet component that paired well with the buns. My sister especially liked the cheesecake buns and was surprised by how good they came out. Her only complaint was that the buns were a little plain. I believe that if I had used the bay leaves like the recipe had called for that they would have come out more flavorful. My sister also thought that the physical appearance of the buns could have been improved by scoring and smoothing the tops better. In my opinion, this experience was a success and a fun family experience. I would definitely try to make these Roman cheesecake buns again!

Libum Recipe (serves four)

Ingredients

– 1 cup plain, all purpose flour

– 8 ounces or 1 cup ricotta cheese

– 1 egg, beaten

– bay leaves

– ½ cup clear honey

Instructions

1. Sift the flour in a mixing bowl.

2. Beat the cheese until soft, stir into the flour.

3. Add the beaten egg to the flour/cheese mixture, forming a soft dough.

4. Divide the dough into four and shape each piece into a bun.

5. Place on a greased baking tray with a fresh bay leaf underneath.

6. Heat the oven to 425 °F. Bake for 35-40 minutes until golden brown.

7. Warm the honey, pour into a flat plate, and place the buns on it to rest until the honey is absorbed.

Emma with the buns before they went into the oven!
The cheesecake buns after soaking in honey!
Ancient Roman Torte!

Ancient Roman Torte!

While home over break, I decided to bake an ancient roman torte.  I did some research on common desserts in ancient Rome and learned they were usually made with some combination of fruits, cheeses, and nuts.  I found a simple recipe made with fruit and cheese filling.  I don’t often cook with ricotta cheese and it is not one of my favorite foods.  However, the recipe intrigued me.  It calls for the ricotta to be sweetened and paired with strawberry jam.  That seemed like an interesting combination of simple ingredients that might be complementary.  In ancient Rome, they didn’t have the variety of ingredients we have today so it is not surprising that they were creative in combining that which they had at their disposal.

The cooking process was straightforward.  The dough called for six ingredients mixed in a large bowl and refrigerated for a short time.  After flattening it with a rolling pin, it was stretched across a pie plate to create the first layer of the torte.  Then strawberry jam is spread generously to create the second layer.  A combination of ricotta and sugar comprises the third layer with the rest of the dough spread across the top to form the rest of the crust.  

After assembling the torte, there is not much else to do.  It is placed in the oven for about 30 minutes.  It smelled wonderful!  My Mom, Dad, and our neighbors all tried the finished torte.   My Dad initially didn’t like the sound of the recipe but he ended up eating several slices!!!  The reviews were all positive! 

In the future, I would add a thicker layer of strawberry jam and a thinner layer of the ricotta filling.  That might be a personal preference, however.  The crust was my favorite part.  It was flaky and mildly sweet.  While making it, I was contemplating the accessibility of some of the necessary ingredients and tools in ancient times.  I did some research and found that sweet cheeses and fruits were readily available to many Romans, but ingredients like granulated sugar and butter were almost non-existent.  I suspect that they must have been using honey and oil which was much more widely obtainable at the time.  The dough and torte needed to be refrigerated before it was placed into the oven and that would have presented a challenge in ancient times, as well.

The recipe: https://anitalianinmykitchen.com/ancient-roman-cake-torta-antica-roma/

Here is a picture of the torte baking!

Here are some photos of the finished torte!
This is me and my family before trying the dessert!

At the Gates: A poem inspired by Livy’s thoughts on Hannibal

At the Gates: A poem inspired by Livy’s thoughts on Hannibal

http://(https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fhistoryofyesterday.com%2Fhannibal-barca-7442e7c97444&psig=AOvVaw1u1w44YlKIqhw5NWzD51rk&ust=1646285649528000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAsQjRxqFwoTCKC5n_zapvYCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD)

Shall I compare thee to a foolish Greek? 

Whose blade has slaughtered countless Roman throats. 

“Perfidy worse than Punic” oh so bleak. 

A lack of fides hath no antidote. 

A demon spawn from the first Punic War.

A man who swore to never be our friend. 

At Trasimene Roman blood spilled galore. 

Republic’s doom; it did indeed impend. 

“Hannibal ad portas!” Children, take heed!

No heat or cold can shake his iron will. 

A fearless fighter of inhuman speed. 

Even a lady he will try to kill. 

But fear not sons of Romulus, we fight!

For Jupiter anoint our blades tonight! 

Hannibal’s Blunder

Hannibal’s Blunder

In the lead up to the Punic Wars, Rome was a civilization on the rise. They had firmly become the dominant Mediterranean land power with their defeats of the Sabines, Etruscans, Samnites, and Pyrrhus. They further cemented their dominance with their victory over the great naval power Carthage in the First Punic War. Rome appeared to be invincible and on a fast track toward complete domination of the Mediterranean. However, out of the ashes of the First Punic War, the man who would strike more fear into Rome than anybody had before would rise up, Hannibal Barca. Although there was no general more skilled than him in the field, Hannibal’s lack of strategic foresight would eventually lead to disastrous consequences for Carthage.

The story of Hannibal is well known. A Carthagian general of unmatched skill who was a sworn enemy of Rome, Hannibal inflicted more pain and fear on Rome than anybody before him. His exploits are legendary. Crossing the Alps with War Elephants to catch Rome completely off guard. Winning battle after battle in Italy. Completely destroying a Roman army in a stroke of military genius still studied today at Cannae. However, even with these great victories, Hannibal was never able to achieve victory. Why?

In my opinion, Hannibal lost the war because he severely underestimated the extent to which the Romans were committed to winning. It appeared that Hannibal’s strategy was to win as many victories as possible in an effort to force Rome to the negotiating table. What he didn’t account for is the fact that surrender isn’t in Rome’s vocabulary. Even after a defeat as horrific as Cannae, the Romans were steadfast in their resolve for victory. Their societal ethos of virtus and fortitude kept them going in the face of disaster. Instead of collapsing, Rome merely buckled down, changed the rules on who can enlist in the military, and raised more legions. If Hannibal could not convince Rome to surrender after Cannae, what could?

It would appear the only thing that would end the war in Carthage’s favor would be total victory, but with every passing day, this became increasingly impossible. Hannibal was marching in a faraway land, with no allies and no way to reinforce and resupply his army besides living off the land. Without the quick knockout that he sought, Rome was able to regroup, stall him in Italy, and win victories over Carthage in Spain and Africa. Suddenly, Carthage was in a war on multiple fronts, and Hannibal’s campaign in Italy was now just a sideshow. The situation eventually got so desperate for Carthage that they had to recall Hannibal in order to help in the defense of Africa. However, by this point the momentum was completely on Rome’s side, and Hannibal was decisively defeated at the Battle of Zama, ending the war in victory for the Romans. 

It is without debate that Hannibal was a general of tremendous skill and talent. However, his strategy of forcing Rome to the negotiating table was doomed from the start, as Rome would never surrender. Had he done his due diligence and realized this before crossing the Alps, maybe he could have fought a smarter war. Perhaps he could have focused on regaining territory that was lost in the First Punic War. Unfortunately, his desire for total victory over the Romans clouded his judgment, and ultimately, despite his prodigious tactical gifts, his shortsighted invasion of Italy would result in the total destruction of his homeland.

2/28/2022 – The Continuing Cultural Relevance of Rome in the PMA

2/28/2022 – The Continuing Cultural Relevance of Rome in the PMA

A few weeks ago we (Anna, Kai-Ling, Kate, and a friend from outside this class) went to the Philadelphia Museum of Art (PMA), and viewed several pieces depicting Roman events. While much of the art at the museum is from later periods of history, there were some wonderful tapestries showing various scenes in the life of Constantine. These tapestries were both instructive in Roman history and acted as examples of the beauty and intricacy of tapestry as an art form. We also saw one of the museum’s most striking pieces, a golden statue of the Roman goddess Diana prominently displayed at the top of a central staircase. 

We found the central placement of these artworks to be interesting: while many of the museum’s collections are concerned with later periods of history, the first pieces visitors will see are Roman in content. The placement of these artworks thus demonstrates Rome’s continued relevance in our institutions of art and culture. While this statue was created for a multi-story building in the 1930’s, we found it remarkable that a Roman deity maintains the literally high cultural placement she might have enjoyed in Ancient Rome so many years and miles away. The statue, having been removed from its placement in the Philadelphia skyline,now resides at the top of the Museums’ central hall and staircase, positioning her again as the deity in a sort of temple and certainly the focal point of the Museum’s most notable indoor space. Even the museum itself resembles a classical temple, though not specifically Roman, its architecture reinforces the primacy of the classical world in modern cultural thought. Likewise, the creation of the pieces itself brought to mind the fact that Rome was similarly seen as relevant in the time of the pieces’ creation, and that Rome has resonated throughout the past as well as in our present.

The friend who accompanied us had studied abroad in Rome, and was also able to remark on his experiences in modern-day Rome in contrast to our learning about ancient Rome. While he was able to see evidence of the continued presence of ancient Roman events and culture in both modern-day Rome and the PMA, he also commented on differences, and we were confronted by how much has been changed and lost across the centuries.

We were also inspired by the tapestries to think on textile work as an art form. Most textile work has traditionally been done by women: even in Roman theology it is Minerva, a goddess, who originated and oversaw tapestry work. Art forms typically undertaken by women have often been denigrated, but it is clear from the scale and detail in the PMA tapestries that such work required great skill and thousands of hours of painstaking work. Interestingly, while likely made exclusively by women, the tapestries depicted almost exclusively men (Constantine and his allies and enemies). Thus the tapestries acted almost as an allegory for broader conceptions of gender roles: the actions of “great men” made visible only through the painstaking labor of women who are themselves invisible and uncredited. Notably, many of these tapestries depicted the Roman armies in moments of great distress, highlighting their fallibility and suffering, rather than just the dramatic triumph or superhuman strength depictions of “great men” more often mythologize. 

Overall, we were struck by art’s ability to connect us to the past, even the very distant past. Given the primary cultural importance of ancient Greece and Rome, we were surprised at the PMA’s lack of actual classical artifacts or even collections but rather the presence of artworks and artifacts that reflect Rome’s ongoing legacy.  Viewing these tapestries and paintings prompted us to critically reflect on the ways in which these pieces were created, and how they have traveled through time and space to eventually be present in the museum with us.

Word Count: 639

Gladiator – The Quintessential Roman Movie

Gladiator – The Quintessential Roman Movie

This weekend, I watched the popular and extremely well liked Roman film Gladiator. I am not someone who usually watches or enjoys action/adventure films so I was pleasantly surprised when the second half of Gladiator really captured my interest. The film is set in 180 A.D. Rome when Marcus Aurelius, a well loved emperor, is dying of old age. He appoints Maximus, a very loyal and skilled General, as his successor despite his lack of political aspirations. Marcus has high hopes that Maximus will fix Rome’s unjust political system. When Marcus’s self-centered and greedy son Commodus finds out his father is going to appoint Maximus as the next emperor, he throws a fit and strangles his father. With his father now dead, Commodus is left in command of the Roman empire. His first task is to have Maximus executed but the cunning general escapes his execution and runs off. Commodus believes Maximus is dead but in reality he winds up in North Africa as a slave to Proximo, a famous former gladiator. The real story starts then as Maximus becomes a gladiator in his own right and fights his way back into the Coliseum. After winning battle after battle and killing countless others, Commodus demands that the gladiator reveal himself and is shocked to learn the brave and daring gladiator that has captured the hearts of thousands of fans is Maximus. After having won the hearts of many Romans the big question is will Maximus win back Rome and restore it to its former republic glory?

When watching the film my favorite part was the scene of chariot racing in the Circus Maximus and seeing how huge and packed the stadium was. It’s really hard for me to imagine the large stadium packed with hundreds of thousands of spectators. The concept of killing each other and watching the killing that takes place after a clear winner in the fight is established is a little unsettling. Another one of my favorite scenes was at the beginning when the role of Marcus Aurelius as father was made clear. He said to Commodus that his faults as a person were his faults as a father which really stuck with me and showed the connection and responsibility that fathers have over their family but especially their sons. In contrast it was really cool to see how he said Maximus was essentially a son to him and acted more like a real son than Commodus ever did.

css.php