Spartacus is sold to Lentulus Batiatus. Batiatus is warned that Spartacus is a rebellious slave, but this spunk is what Batiatus is looking for, since Batiatus runs a gladiator training school and sees potential in Spartacus. Spartacus spends some time training and falls in love with the slave Varinia during this time. Senator Crassus comes to visit Batiatus’s school and not only requests that they watch a gladiator fight to the death, but also buys Varinia. Sparticus barely gets away from his fight with his life because his opponent decides to try to kill Crassus after beating Spartacus instead of going for the kill on Spartacus. This is enough to push Spartacus over his limit, and a few days later Spartacus starts a successful slave revolt, although Batiatus escapes with his life. The slave revolt gains traction across Rome, and soon Spartacus is leading an army in the thousands. They move to make their escape from Rome by getting help from pirates to take them across the sea. However, Crassus, who is in charge of putting down this rebellion, bribes the pirates to betray Spartacus. This forces Spartacus and his army to have to move towards Rome, where Crassus and his army are waiting. Spartacus inspires everyone to go down fighting, and they put up a fight against Crassus’s army for a little bit, but are ultimately crushed. The survivors, which include Spartacus, are offered a deal that if the slaves identify Spartacus among the living or the dead, they would be pardoned and sent back to slavery. However, Spartacus’s army refuses by all claiming that they are Spartacus. This leads to Crassus sentencing every one of them to death by crucifixion. Varinia is able to escape from Crassus with her and Spartacus’s child since Crassus spared them, and Spartacus is able to see the two of them while on the cross as they leave Rome.

There were some historical inaccuracies in the movie of course. The biggest one is that every major Roman historian of the time writes that Spartacus died in that final battle against Crassus. The other egregious inaccuracy was that Crassus was given the role of consul before defeating Sparticus’s army. The whole point of why Crassus was so determined to beat Sparticus was to earn his consulship. The movie changed Crassus’s motivations from that to simply a hatred toward Sparticus.

A) log-in at:  http://romanrev.iris.sites.haverford.edu/wp-admin/. You should have received an email inviting you to register for the site.

B) Select “Posts” in the left menu’ then “Add New”

C) Add your post into the text field, add a catchy title and the necessary categories, and click PUBLISH. OR edit an existing page as needed. Always remember to click PUBLISH.

Study after study has shown that the mere presence of devices (even if you are not using them!) dramatically reduces comprehension, retention, and happiness in a class. This is true whether the device is a phone, a tablet, or a laptop, whether the device is being used openly or surreptitiously, to avoid the class activity or to take detailed notes even while paying close attention.

If you are using a device, you will likely will into the trap of attempting to multitask (which the human brain cannot do). While we can task-switch between activities, even this comes at a cognitive cost. It can take up to 30 minutes to return to full focus on an activity after you switch to another task (like looking at a notification on your phone).

There are, of course, times when using a device is necessary: there may be a class activity that uses a device, or you may an accommodation because of an inability to write. But unless using a device is absolutely necessary, it is almost a certainty that the cost outweighs the benefit in an academic setting where deep engagement is essential. 

“The Case for Banning Laptops in the Classroom” By Dan Rockmore (2014)

A Learning Secret: Don’t Take Notes with a Laptop by Cindi May (2014)

Students who used longhand remembered more and had a deeper understanding of the material.

“For better learning in college lectures, lay down the laptop and pick up a pen”
by Susan M. Dynarski (2017)

Do computers help or hinder classroom learning in college? Step into any college lecture and you’ll find a sea of students with laptops and tablets open, typing as the professor speaks. With their enhanced ability to transcribe content and look up concepts on the fly, are students learning more from lecture than they were in the days of paper and pen? A growing body of evidence says “No.” When college students use computers or tablets during lecture, they learn less and earn worse grades. The evidence consists of a series of randomized trials, in both college classrooms and controlled laboratory settings.

“The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking” by Pam A. Mueller, Daniel M. Oppenheimer (2014)

The present research suggests that even when laptops are used solely to take notes, they may still be impairing learning because their use results in shallower processing. In three studies, we found that students who took notes on laptops performed worse on conceptual questions than students who took notes longhand. We show that whereas taking more notes can be beneficial, laptop note takers’ tendency to transcribe lectures verbatim rather than processing information and reframing it in their own words is detrimental to learning.

“The Laptop and the Lecture: The Effects of Multitasking in Learning” by Helene Hembrooke and Geri Gay (2003)

THE EFFECTS OF MULTITASKING IN THE CLASSROOM were investigated in students in an upper level Communications course. Two groups of students heard the same exact lecture and tested immediately following the lecture. One group of students was allowed to use their laptops to engage in browsing, search, and/or social computing behaviors during the lecture. Students in the second condition were asked to keep their laptops closed for the duration of the lecture. The experiment showed that, regardless of the kind or duration of the computer use, the disconnected students performed better on a post-lecture quiz.

So what should I do?

“The Best Note-Taking Methods For college students & serious note-takers“

The object of this course is for you to learn what it is like to be a Roman. To do so we will investigate what made the Romans revolutionary in their time and of lasting influence thereafter. It is not a history course, though we will be covering 1,000 years of Roman history, parts of it in some significant detail. Still less is it a literature course or an art history course, though we will be reading some of the greatest literature ever written and studying the sculptural and architectural monuments that gave shape to the European tradition, mediating the Greek achievement to what we now call the West. Think of it instead as a moral orientation to Roman republicanism. What do we mean by “moral” or “republicanism,” or for that matter “Roman”? Fourteen weeks from now you will know!

Overview of the Course: The course culminates in a three-week role playing game, in which you will embody a particular Roman persona on a particular occasion in the Senate of 63 BCE. For the previous eleven weeks you study for your part in this game by learning Roman history from the 7^th century bc to the 4^th century ad and by learning how a Roman, specifically your Roman, might think and talk about this material and about other things. Also, separate from the game, you will spend a week living like an Epicurean or a Stoic. Implicit in this exercise and in the game is a critique of modernity in its political, ethical, rhetorical, and in the broadest sense cultural forms.

Thus by the summer, with any luck, you will have won some insight into what it is to be a 1^st century bc Roman and also what it is to be a person living in the 21^st century CE. Along the way we’ll touch in ways large and small on concepts like…